Hiring with Stream

Power-up Hiring: Save Time, Cut Costs, and Secure Top Talent

Speed | Hire faster & reduce hassle

Passive candidate sourcing can eat up days of a recruiter’s time, especially when dealing with a limited talent pool. Many recruiters have to block off entire days to source 25-50+ candidates for a role, only to repeat the process if the initial batch doesn’t yield results. With Stream, that’s a thing of the past. We handle all the heavy lifting by continuously providing a steady flow of candidates, ensuring your calendar is never short of qualified calls.

Adaptability | Adaptable and agile process

If a hiring manager changes hiring criteria after meeting a few candidates, no worries. Simply let us know, and we’ll update the pipeline immediately. This way, your talent flow is never disrupted, and you’re always on track to find the right fit quickly and efficiently.

Insights | Data-rich insights

Unlike traditional agencies, with Stream, you keep all the data from each campaign. This data is fed into your ATS and used to build a comprehensive profile of what types of candidates are most likely to succeed. These insights allow us to adjust and improve targeting on the fly, reducing your time-to-hire and ensuring better fit candidates​.

Expertise | Expertise across industries

Our veteran sourcers have worked on hundreds of campaigns in every major tech field—from AI to HealthTech. This deep industry knowledge allows us to find top talent that matches the unique needs of each role, leading to more successful hires at every level​.

Cost | Cost-effective hiring

Traditional agency fees can range from 15% to over 35% of a candidate’s salary, which adds up quickly. One Stream slot costs $12,000 per year and can generate multiple hires, saving you hundreds of thousands of dollars in placement fees. For instance, Scribd saved $228,000 in just five months by using Stream instead of an agency​.